View Single Post
Old 02-25-2014, 06:24 PM   #25
BucEyedPea BucEyedPea is offline
BucPatriot
 
BucEyedPea's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: None of your business
Casino cash: $8895
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox View Post
If you mean the IPCC, the authors (which is what matters) are all almost exclusively scientists. If you disagree, feel free to point out the ones that aren't.

http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/ar5/ar5_autho...rs_updated.pdf
I meant the IPCC and those who attended. There was something about the final reports that was fishy for lack of a better word that I posted in one of those threads but I can't recall the details.

I have found this though: *raises eyebrows*

Sept 18, 2013
On Tuesday, a group of 50 international scientists released a comprehensive new report on the science of climate change that concluded that evidence now leans against global warming resulting from human-related greenhouse gas emissions.

The report, which cites thousands of peer-reviewed articles the United Nations-sponsored panel on climate change ignored,
also found that "no empirical evidence exists to substantiate the claim that 2C of warming presents a threat to planetary ecologies or environments" and no convincing case can be made that "a warming will be more economically costly than an equivalent cooling." The U.N.'s panel is scheduled to release its next report next month.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change, or NIPCC, which produced the report, is described as "an international panel of scientists and scholars who came together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change." Unlike the "United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which is government-sponsored, politically motivated, and predisposed to believing that climate change is a problem in need of a U.N. solution," NIPCC "has no formal attachment to or sponsorship from any government or governmental agency" and is "wholly independent of political pressures and influences and therefore is not predisposed to produce politically motivated conclusions or policy recommendations."
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...Global-Warming
Now this is what I was referring to when I mentioned the politics behind it. Not the actual science but that this is in need of a UN solution....likely for more global governance that will erode US sovereignty and socialism aka hardship.
__________________
Posts: 57,520
BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote