View Single Post
Old 02-25-2014, 07:24 PM   #42
BucEyedPea BucEyedPea is offline
BucPatriot
 
BucEyedPea's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: None of your business
Casino cash: $8750
Quote:
Originally Posted by cdcox View Post
So far your examples are Richard Lindzen, who agrees that anthropogenic climate change is happening, but argues mostly about how bad it will be.
No Lindzen does not agree GW is man-made.

http://newmexico.watchdog.org/15128/...-presentation/


Lindzen does not side with GW alarmists ( which is the difference here) but that any warming is slight. I agree there is some change but is too little for alarm--in fact is beneficial. So do scientists who have signed the Oregon Petition Institute.

Quote:
And a discredited report paid for by the Heritage Institute.

You have discredited people and outliers.
Nope. In your opinion and reliance on logical fallacy. So, none of this is an argument for declaring there is a consensus among scientists. There isn't.
__________________
Posts: 57,501
BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.BucEyedPea is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote