Originally Posted by cosmo20002
By any definition, the activists are not censoring anybody.
But I wonder if Kurtz or Krauthammer would use their columns to carry a full rebuttal from the activists, or maybe an essay from you or me. To not do so would be censorship, which clearly cannot be allowed.
Now who is trying to hide behind semantics? The activists certainly have no power to censor anyone, but they are calling on the Washington Post to censor someone as the thread OP indicates.