Originally Posted by Brock
You said "there is little choice for the consumer to go elsewhere with their money". The consumer has literally unlimited choices for where they go with their money.
Not in this case.
To my knowledge there is only one pro-football outdoor league in the US.
They'd have to not watch or switch to indoor, Canadian, college or semi-professional. It's not an unlimited list though.
But again, this topic is not about the consumer or viewers. If it were, it's another matter.
This is about a league applying political pressure to a state entity, because they're really an adjunct or dependent on govt and have to. ( even though owners make back more than the money they take from taxpayers to build their stadiums.)
Before you read the “Outside The Lines” report, consider this:
Taping the opposing team’s sideline still isn’t banned; only taping the opposing team from the sideline is illegal.
Also remember this:
Taping the opposing team from the sideline wasn’t banned until 2006, yet the report cites examples as far back as 2000. ~NESN