Originally Posted by patteeu
No, I took it to mean that you oppose the law because it allows discrimination (or what I'll call freedom of association and freedom of religious practice). If so, that's what I thought was odd for a libertarian.
It isn't typically libertarian. It's more to the progressive-left stand on the issue.
“Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government’s purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.” — James Madison