Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy
Yes, it really is. He tweeted that he hoped the sons and daughters of NRA supporters would shot and killed. Here is a link to a story with the tweet in it--
I made sure to use a liberal approved link.
The Kansas professor advocated a commission of a crime---murder by handgun, specifically. The Daily Caller is calling out the Harvard girl for advocating that their be no line...that they simply not let anyone voice anything that is not liberal approved.
If a conservative professor at Harvard were to say he hoped Obama got shot tomorrow and called the First Lady a wookie, then I would certainly agree with him being removed.
The gal at Harvard is advocating banning speakers before they speak (she is advocating that those speakers she opposed not be allowed onto campus in the first place)...while in the Kansas situation, no one prevented him from speaking, they merely held him accountable for what he said.
Not that I expect you to see the difference....criticizing the left is something that no one in DC has ever seen you do.
I know what he said--that next time there's a shooting, let it be the NRA supporters kid killed. He wasn't wishing for a shooting.
Like I said, the point is that you agree there's a line that can be crossed. You're arguing about details when the article is whining about the suggestion of a line in the first place.