Quote:
Originally Posted by Stanley Nickels
That's a red herring, the question was whether that mans life could've been spared if it meant risking the dog's life. I think so, and I think it's ridiculous to cite the cost of the dog to defend the officers' actions.
|
Well I didn't mean it like a defense for the officers actions, the actions of the officers are already clearly defended by the actions of pulling knives when getting arrested. Using the dog (a tool for the officers) would be misuse in this instance. Dogs are not the answer for deadly force.
And the mans life could've been spared like it had in precious occasions when he didn't pull knives out on the arresting officers.
Can we please not lose personal accountability.