Quote:
Originally Posted by planetdoc
ok. will walk you through it.
already linked the first. US originally said that a cyberattack is an act of war. Than Hayden said stuxnet is " not an act of war." Thus the position was undermined.
already linked documents citing this in this thread. the link below goes further into the topic and provides sources.
The Currency of Exploitation
sure, that is why it took security researchers years to detect and figure out stuxnet. That being said, there is no evidence of a cyberattack similar to stuxnet prior to stuxnet.
that is no way in any level comparable to stuxnet. Those type of attacks are not sophisticated and can be done by anyone unlike the sophistication of stuxnet. Its like comparing handguns to nuclear weapons. |
What a cop out. First you said the US launched the first cyber warfare attack. Now, you're complaining because the US may not have actually started it, but they did it better. I hope we continue to be better. You're desperate to blame the US. I think your arguments are garbage.
BTW, I don't care whether one person said cyber warfare is an act of war and then a different person said it isn't. As far as I'm concerned, that's an attempt to deflect from the issue.