Quote:
Originally Posted by Omaha
No. You cannot argue that. Not without sounding like an idiot.
And you are misinterpreting the definition if you think that behaving irrationally is an acceptable defense for murdering someone.
If you are trolling, well done. You got me. If not,  |
He's not saying the guy is innocent of murder, he's arguing the difference between man slaughter and murder 1.
Personally I disagree, moving the incapacitated intruders around to “finish them off” seems a pretty clear indication of premeditation to me. I'm just not going to get worked up over it and will wait to see what the jury decides.