Quote:
Originally Posted by Silock
That's a bit disingenuous. Some studies just aren't constructed very well or controlled, like the China study. Therefore, some studies are just more valid than others. If you can find multiple well-constructed studies that contradict each other, it's very likely that the outcomes are specific to the individual and not necessarily generally applicable. Some studies are just better than others. And if a study is repeatable, it's more valid than one which is not. Creatine studies are almost always replicable, and that's why we know it works so well.
I guarantee it was just a matter of taking in less calories than you were before.
3 days a week. Cardio on off days.
|
No argument here. That study was poorly designed. Even the critical analysis you provided a link to did offer up that a diet higher in fruits and veggies, and lower in red mean is recommended though. Again, the china diet may be poorly designed, but the facts about the micronutrition it is based on are real.