['Hamas' Jenkins]

Originally Posted by Detoxing

My post isn't referring to you being right or wrong, it's about whether or not you're being objective.

Your posts are rarely ever objective because the only time you really post is to do battle with homers. You remove objectivity in order to drive home your point.

I'll always remember a specific thread you made....it was after some preseason games iirc. I remember it because it was completely objective. It was rare. You didn't make it to argue with homers, you made it to have an objective analysis.

I was able to read it and go down the list

yup
yup
yup
yup
ehhh...i disagree
yup

It was a fantastic thread because it highlighted the negatives and positives, rather than just the negatives.

Most of the time, however, you simply post to call homers dumbasses. It's hard to call you objective when your sole purpose is to tell the sunshine and rainbow crowd that they're stupid. You get so hell bent on proving them wrong that your posts lose their objectivity.

The homers are dumbasses. Look at the Royals threads here. Anyone who would say they think the Royals can turn it around and win 92 games this year would be labeled a dumbass. The Chiefs have the same level of incompetence, but similar levels of scorn are labeled as hating. Pointing that out does not make one subjective; it's stating facts.

There are dozens of posters on here who do exactly what Know Mo does, just with different laundry. That's the definition of subjective hypocrisy.

I've always been fair and supportive of players who played well, but I'm not going to bullshit myself about a scrub just because his success would make the Chiefs a better team.

I'm one of the rare breed on this forum who thinks that Dwayne Bowe is a good player and that Mike Catapano isn't going to be JJ Watt. That's not hating.