View Single Post
Old 10-30-2014, 11:16 AM   #163
penbrook penbrook is offline
LEGEND!
 
penbrook's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2013
Casino cash: $10033840
Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho View Post
5th rotation options next year:

Internal:
Christian Binford, Brandon Finnegan, John Lamb, Liam Hendriks

If the Royals try to fill this spot internally, there are not a lot of great/proven options. Lamb has never quite recovered from his Tommy John surgery, though he has shown flashes at times. Hendriks is just a guy/emergency starter. Binford blew through the minors in 2014 but doesn't have much experience at Omaha as a starting pitcher and has only made 8 starts above AA. He's not a "stuff" guy, but he gets results. Finnegan won't need to build up innings, but he hasn't worked through the upper minors as a starter.

End result: Trying to fill the spot internally from Day 1 seems like a stretch unless someone makes a huge leap in spring training.

Trade
Trading for a pitcher like Ian Kennedy might cost a little in terms of talent surrendered, but there are sure to be quality SPs available via trade.

End result: This is probably the safest route for the Royals to take to add a 5th pitcher, but it could be costly in prospects.

Free Agency:
This is the riskiest method for the Royals in terms of commitment and money, but finding a second-tier guy who can eat innings and who likely "pitches up" playing in the K with this D behind him.

Brandon McCarthy is not a bad suggestion, though I wonder what type of deal/years he's going to be looking for.

Ultimately, I think they sign a second-tier guy in FA or make a trade. They'll be serious about winning again next year, and it's hard to imagine doing that with Liam Hendriks as your No. 5 starter at the beginning of the year.
Hendriks got traded to the Blue Jays about a hr ago. We are getting a catcher in return
Posts: 16,409
penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.penbrook would the whole thing.
    Reply With Quote