|
I just think it's funny that Nate Silver analyzes postseason clutch factor, determines the Pats would've gone 13-13 with a replacement level QB, and then the Pats fans come here and shit all over it and call it terrible analysis ...
Would love to have seen it it was turned around.
Tom 8-18
Peyton 12-12
It would have been great analysis and well researched if that was the case.
So, in essence, this thread is exactly what I expected. Amnorix and Just Passin' By never let me down.
They are both more qualified to analyze QB's than Nate Silver.
|