[Discuss Thrower]

Originally Posted by Just Passin' By

Here's that thread trail:





Then you came in.

So, to sum up: One person was responding to a question about scoring (PPG, with the wrong PPG ranking), by citing some things that would have a tendency to limit scoring, and one of those is a lack of turnovers created.

Do us all a favor and read the threads, or at least read the thread trails you want to comment about, before you post.

I'll do whatever I want.

And you've done nothing to disprove what I've pointed out was bullshit about sandy dumbass' leading assertion of why the Chiefs weren't successful (because he ignores the fact that an inferior offensive line would ultimately ruin a running game's metrics even though the numbers don't bear that out) largely because of the defense not getting takeaways.. which is a totally unpredictable, mostly random chance.


In short, the Chiefs' were poor offensively because of the defense being unlucky.

And, even if turnovers were less than 50% luck driven, if the defense is allowing fewer than 18 points a game, is it really necessary that they are also leading in turnovers?