Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass
A NYT review of Moldea's book that the nuts are citing:
http://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/03/bo...e-conduct.html
But there is too much sloppy journalism to trust the bulk of this book's 512 pages - including its whopping 64 pages of notes.
You should read the entire review. You should also know that Moldea sued them for libel over the review and lost.
Dan Moldea is a con man. I've read a couple of his books. I believe RFK was killed by a conspiracy, but even a believer like me can tell his book about it is pure crap. |
lol did you pay attention to the interview? the ny times was obviously commissioned to smear campaign his book.
what the hell does losing in court have to do with truth? it has to do with who has the most pull.
again,..why even take the guy to court if he doesnt know what he's talking about?
you have no idea who the actual con man is.
horse players and gamblers started the nfl but yeah..somehow they wanted this to be the legit business?