Quote:
Originally Posted by splatbass
Dan Moldea is not an historian. He's a crackpot. If you choose to get your "research" from a crackpot with no credibility then you are nuts.
Here is a little tip: Anyone can write a book. The fact that you read something in a book doesn't make it right or lend it any credibility. There is no peer review for these kind of books. Anyone can literally put any crazy thing they want in them.
|
My point was everything has a reference point and you are in fact using faith to believe that its false with no actual reference of your own while we are using common sense interpretation of unrealistic situations ending too perfectly. Using plenty of reference points and quotes and individuals etc
You just keep saying it's a coincidence with nothing else to counter the examples to everything said. You can't have 200 coincidences.
You don't even know what you are debating about. I'm pretty sure I've insulted you less then you have insulted me