Quote:
Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19
My stance is that I think KC would have a better chance to win the SB in 2017 with Foles rather than Smith. Perhaps a much better chance, but we haven't saw enough of Foles to really say how that might go for 16 games.
|
Nick Foles isn't taking this team anywhere. Realistically the Chiefs just need to take their medicine and reap what they have sown with the idiotic Smith trade and extension.
They are now caught between a rock and a hard place, and they must choose the least expensive option that damages them the least for the foreseeable future. That means no Smith, and definitely no Romo, an option which should make every Chiefs fan's skin CRAWL with disgust.
Because what are you going to do if they go 10-6 with Foles? Give HIM an extension? No...you're going to draft a damn QB.
Barring an unrealistic Super Bowl fantasy, Nick Foles success/failure should not determine the future of this franchise.
If he plays well next season he can stay on as a backup or compete with a rookie. At a cheap price.
Lay in the bed you made, Chiefs.
But of course who are we kidding. Smith will be back and in November we'll hear the first rumor of another extension.
YIPPEEEEEE!