Quote:
Originally Posted by -King-
A rookie. If I'm forced to keep one, I'd keep Smith. He's the better QB as much as some would hate to admit it.
But if I don't have to keep one, I'd cut both and move on. Im not even a bring Romo in fan, but if I have to have a vet QB to start while the rookie learns, I'd MUCH rather have him than either Foles or Smith.
Posted via Mobile Device
|
I generally agree with your football takes, cant believe this is where you're at
Truth is none of us know what Foles could amount to in a full time role under Reid... the only thing any of us can be certain of is that...
a) it will be a much more exciting brand of football
b) that Hill, Kelce and Maclin will rarely streak wide open and not get their due targets
Fors Gods sake, dont even TRY to tell me that Smith doesnt demoralize his playmakers... we see it every. ****ing. game
They're waving their hands in vain, slumping their shoulders in vain... Reid must surely do a great job of tamping it down, because under a lesser HC offensive skill players would be RIOTING by now