[DJ's left nut]

Originally Posted by staylor26

Please dear god let this man fall to 27 so I don't have to be miserable when we don't draft a QB

So let's say there's a way to sacrifice next year's first in a manner that moves us up to the early 20s and then moves our 2nd up to the back of the 1st.

And no, I have no idea if that's even remotely reasonable, but lets say we give up this years first and next years first. That would give us roughly, what, 1150 points in 'draft chart' value? Conservatively 1100?

And he's there with Miami's pick, so you give Miami both 1sts for their 1st and 2nd. Maybe you have to throw in pick 170 to sweeten the pot.

Now you take 54 (Miami) and 59 (ours) and get NO to send us 32 in exchange and take Davis Webb.

You do that, right? I mean, it's risky as hell because what happens if in the interim Webb goes off the board between Miami and NO and you're left with Foster and a little more 2nd round firepower but nothing you're desperate to use it on now that the QB is gone. Technically the 'value' of those 2 picks should get you up to roughly GBs spot which would be a damn nice spot to get to ahead of Pittsburgh and with a nice relationship with the respective GMs (and little concern of the QB biting them as he's going to the AFC; moreover, GB loves building in the draft and could prefer that extra pick).

Now you've used this years first next years first, a 2nd and a 5th to get Foster and Webb.

I mean...that's a win, right? Or are we just completely wrong about these QBs. Could Webb fall to the late 2nd anyway? In which case you could've just used your 3rd to move up to Miami's spot and snag Foster.