Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate
Soooo.....
When you're sporting a minimum of FOUR+ pro-bowl and all-pro players on your defense, filling the gaps with players that can be classified as "competent" just isn't going to get it done?
This defense needs to completely re-tool for an aggressive 4-3 which boasts at minimum one monster rushing DE, one monster rushing OLB, one elite CB, one elite to above average Safety, and a box-killing ILB.
Those very minimum and simple components, several of which are ALREADY IN THE CAN, can be used by a new and aggressive-minded D-Coord to create a Chiefs defense that can wipe this last 2 decades of bullshit off the map, and make this league remember why facing a Chiefs defense in Arrowhead Stadium is a dangerous proposition.
You're free to think to think otherwise, but I contend that the Chiefs have not played "Chiefs Defense" for AT LEAST 18 years now.
|
IMO we were getting it done as early as last year. I would consider holding the Steelers potent offense to 18 points is getting it done, but the shit offense has to score more.
I can’t blame that playoff game on Sutton.
As for the 4-3, we’ve use those looks. We basically used a 4-3 a ton vs the Raiders and it worked beautifully.
Can’t see us going to it full time. Reggie Ragland is probably our best young player on defense and he is absolutely not a fit for a 4-3. He was horrible in that role in Buffalo. Would hate to switch and waste such a good young talent.