Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
News flash:
Dustin Colquitt isn’t making 4 mil per year on his new contract like you said which is what originally started this debate. It’s a slightly above average deal. Also, I don’t think anybody would expect a good punter to have much of a correlation to winning statistically, since they’re ****ing punters.
That still doesn’t mean it’s useless to have a good one week in and week out. You know what’s worse? Paying a guy like Donald Stephenson 4 mil per which is the kind of shitty contract a lot of teams have.
Now, go show us some analytics on short WR’s as proof Tyreek Hill won’t work out at WR! 
|
Sure, teams have shitty contracts. Most of them are shitty teams.
If a punter doesn't have much correlation to winning, why over pay or pay one more than the minimum?