Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteWhale
That's a ****ing trick question.
If he played for those teams of course not, because it's shit-talking ammo. You don't just IGNORE that as a fan. Everyone is a hypocrite regarding teams they love and teams they hate.
I'm just in a 'wait and see' stage. Seeing the kid out of the house isn't a good sign though. At this point you're just hoping for negligence and stupidity rather than anything violent.
|
This line of thinking is part of the problem with clickbait headlines.
It doesn’t mean anything in terms of guilt. It’s precautionary and makes sense considering the history there. It’s all about the safety of the child, as it should be.
I’m not saying he’s not guilty, just pointing out that the temporary loss of custody doesn’t mean much other than the kids safety is what’s most important while this is being resolved.