Quote:
Originally Posted by mr. tegu
I didn’t suggest that at all. You asked how they could believe a crime was committed without evidence to suggest it. I provided an answer. Those circumstances may be factual but they are not evidence of a crime. Furthermore, it could have been the same with each visit.
Also you keep repeating “no one is talking” but that is a pretty baseless assumption. You make it sound like they are hiding from police or withholding information which implies purposely lying and guilt which isn’t fair to them. It’s possible but it isn’t a known fact at all. The kid not being in their custody can happen when an injury occurs, regardless of whether it was purposeful habitual abuse or an honest accident of over parenting or punishment or somewhere in between. It just depends on circumstances and if they feel the child needs to be in a safer environment. A lot of things can still happen regarding their future custody but those are more personal issues for him and the family. Ideally the case gets dismissed after all goals of a plan from the case conference are met.
|
You tried to compare a complete investigation to a first impression...
What else am I suppose to assume is happening when the DA says, "It bothers us to see what has happened to this child and not be able to do anything about it" and labeling it a "whodunit"?