Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho
Long and short of what I have been told:
There was physical evidence of abuse of the child (not a broken arm, much much worse and not accidental). Without that, the child isn’t removed by family services.
Initial reports indicated Hill perpetrated the abuse.
Neither of the parents ended up being willing to talk to police about what happened.
They know something happened to the kid. Just can’t prove now who did it. Initially thought they’d be able to before the classic DV cycle kicked in and the initial report of who did it was recanted.
|
The one thing we can say then: This poor kid has shit for parents. **** him, I guess.