Quote:
Originally Posted by FAX
Thanks, Mr. God of Thunder ...
We can assume that if there was more salacious content, they would have aired that part, right? I mean, only an idiot producer would hold back the most controversial and/or damning sections of audio. (Naturally, for the informed public's enjoyment, of course ... and not saying they don't have idiots on staff.)
As someone said, the "optics" (I hate that term) certainly suck. It conveys to the listener an unsettling impression of a terribly immature and dysfunctional relationship. Tyreek sounds absolutely pussy whipped here.
It also makes the kid look like a whiney little bitch ... "Mama ... daddy's mean!". Wow ... Damien indeed.
FAX
|
Fax, I might disagree with you on a lot of things, but I typically respect your views.
You just referred to a 3-year-old kid who is a victim of abuse as a "whiney (sic) little bitch." And then used your "Damien" term again for the kid which smacks of veiled racism.
You always made a point of saying that you cared about the child and that was important to you. How do you square your alleged concern with the child with your language used above?
Genuine question. You can respond in flowery language with mellifluous terms and I promise I'll be able to follow along.