Quote:
Originally Posted by duncan_idaho
I’ve said for several weeks now that I no longer believe he’ll be charged and that he shouldn’t be.
My early thoughts on this were shaped by the initial story presented by the mom to law enforcement. She backed off that quickly. It has become a quagmire as time has gone all.
All I’m convinced of now is that someone went far too far with hitting a three year old boy with a belt. As long as that child is being protected moving forward, I’m good with that outcome.
|
Wait just a ding-dong desperate demi-second there ...
Am I thinking of another poster? Because I have this very specific memory of you stating on this board that you had "inside information" based on your contacts within the police department. That, combined with your legal expertise, was the basis for your belief that Tyreek was guilty of breaking Damien's arm, punching him in the chest, and whipping him with a belt hard enough to warrant arrest.
Do I have you confused with someone else? If so, I apologize in advance. If not, WTF?
FAX