Quote:
Originally Posted by Titty Meat
Sounds like some of my family who disowned my dad when he said give Callahan a chance.
I dont know you personally but I have a hard time believing if he got kids from St.Louis to come and hire a capable DC like Strong that if they start winning you would still boycott the football program.
I get Hamas's argument and it makes perfect sense we do know if Kiffin comes be will get kids who can play and in 3/4 years when he leaves the cupboard wont be bare. You cant say the same for a guy like Fickell.
Norvell is an interesting hire. Hes done a good job but weve seen how the AAC golden boy does at a big boy program. Verdict is still out at best you have to give him 4-5 years which raises the question do Mizzou fans have that kind of patience?
|
"He can recruit" is the "he sets the edge" of college coaching analysis. Or maybe "he has a quick release" when talking about college quarterbacks.
It sounds reasonably well-informed, is fairly difficult to disprove (so most won't bother trying) and can be used in the event you can't point to obvious tangible accomplishments or attributes.
It's what people say about a coach when they can't come up with a
real argument in his favor. It is, at BEST, a backhanded compliment and it never gets applied to people who ever win anything.
It's what you say about Frank Haith, who then gets asked to prove it under genuinely trying circumstances and falls on his face.
Lane Kiffin will SUCK here. Horribly. He won't be any better at getting St. Louis kids to come here than anyone else has been. And he's a ****ing moron so he'll lose. A lot.
There's not a single good reason to hire that legacy gomer. But/for his dad crafting a defense that was obsolete before he retired, Kiffin would be coaching special teams in High school. He can eat a whole bucket of dicks.