Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawnmower
This is what you said. It is you that is dishonest for backpeddling faster than a fat lesbian on a bicycle going down a hill in SF.
Look at this quote, BY YOU. Then actually read all of my arguments. You cannot prove this statement, as I have spent post after post explaining to you. It is also difficult for me (as I have explained) to write a 200 page thesis and do the studies necessary to prove that your stupid statement is not provable.
You can claim I am being dishonest, but how? I used the word "tough" instead of "hard" ? Come on MAN. Just admit that this statement above isn't provable by any means and move on. They played a bunch of teams with a high win % on the back stretch.....but the "hardest 6 game stretch" of all time? Thats a little much.....as I have explained over and over. ANd no I am not being dishonest. Thats your words...which youre walking back on now...my point (if you need a summary) is win % is not a good measure of a hard opponent sometimes, and then trying to extrapolate that over a huge history of the NFL with different schedules and bye weeks etc...impossible...
|
No, you're just being semantic. You know exactly what I meant but you want to bs about what the word "hard" means in this context. I don't have to provide evidence for your definition of "hard", that's your burden. My version was reported, easily provable, and commonly understood.
All because you want to go all esoteric to avoid giving the 49ers credit where credit is due.
We accomplished something hard that hasn't ever been done before in the post-merger NFL. Does Mahomes throw an interception if you admit that? Does Hill lose a couple tenths off his 40?
You're pathetic