Quote:
Originally Posted by jettio
Those linked stories are no more authoritative than you or I or Carlos watching the FIFA feed and guessing about the original call based on the video feed and whatever the announcers on our version of the feed are guessing about what the call is.
If there are no pictures or video of a goal kick being signaled by the referee and no statement from FIFA that a goal kick was signaled by the referee then there is no case to make about an original call of goal kick being overruled by "inconclusive" evidence.
|
My god you're a ****ing dumb ass.... You're missing the point.
You're asking where is the evidence that the call on the field was "NO GOAL" I'm asking the same ****ing question, where is the evidence that the call on the field was a "GOAL".. How is this so hard to comprehend for your brain?
I see a lot more evidence pointing to the fact that both teams and the refs were believing it was NOT a goal, rather than it BEING a goal... If you noticed everyone stopped post it going in, because obviously there were refs and other people saying HOLD ON HOLD ON.
The EXACT same reaction happened with our 2nd goal in the IRAN game. Our guy scored, started celebrating and stopped JUST like Japan.
So again, this isn't rocket science dude. When you say its inconclusive, and you're going with the call on the field, where/when was the call on the field made prior to going to the VAR? My god dude.