Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyHammersticks
Hi Gordon, welcome! Are you by chance related to fellow Canadian Gordon Lightfoot?
I believe that the Chiefs offense of line will still be much better than the offense of line for the Bengals. The Chiefs essentially have 3 All-Pro offense of linemen in the middle. Adding a more athletic left tackle - the offense of lineman they signed from the Jags - and choosing from Lucas Niang, an offense of lineman who was hurt last season, and Darian Kinnard, an offense of lineman they drafted last year, and anyone they pick up in the draft this year should put them in a good spot, YOU HOSER! (just kidding, I was eating back bacon dipped in maple syrup and couldn't resist!)
Now take off, eh?
|
Definitely agree that the Chiefs offensive line is still better than the bangles. All I’m saying is that I think the Bengals have improved more than the Chiefs at least at the offensive line. And given the razor thin margin between the two teams, relative improvement is, what is important. Someone else suggested, the Bengals have regressed at safety [which they certainly have] and the Chiefs have improved. [I really don’t think so]. They also suggested the Chiefs improved at linebacker and defensive end. [Hopefully, but we need to wait and see.] and looking at both teams overall Kansas City Chiefs roster a key question is whether SKYY Moore or Kadarius Tooney improve so they’re wide receivers are no longer a mash unit.
Several others posted with friendly comments about Canada. I think they were friendly. Anyway I think you for those, eh.