[TEX]

Originally Posted by gordonelloyd

I just joined this forum. Maybe this is already been discussed and I certainly didn’t read all of the posts but I read some of them. And I didn’t see it.

I think the real question is whether with what happened Cincinnati is more improved or Kansas City is more improved on the offence of line. They both have additional work to do for their right tackle. It’s unclear what Kansas City will do. Cincinnati in the end they will probably have Williams at right tackle, and he is likely to be satisfactory.

My view is that there is more uncertainty in the Kansas City situation[how will Taylor adjust to left tackle and who will be the right tackle and will he come from the draft] then in the Cincinnati situation where Brown will definitely be an upgrade and probably even pretty good, although not elite, and the same will apply for Williams and right tackle.

so I think comparatively speaking [ is all that really matters ] Cincinnati will have improve themselves more than Kansas City. And although we won the championship game over the Bengals, the margin was razor thin, and really came down to that stupid play. Their guy made when he roughed Mahomes out of bounds.

I like both teams actually. [I am from Ottawa Canada] but I do cheer for the Chiefs.

Given the contract Brown signed for with the Bengals I don’t understand why the Chiefs couldn’t have signed both brown and Taylor.

Anyway, let’s see what other people think and I hope this hasn’t been covered before.

Eat shit pie, queer!

Just kidding...Welcome. Now go kill yourself!