Quote:
Originally Posted by manchambo
You’re all hat, no cattle. Your first point is entirely hyperbolic rhetoric without a single intelligible factual point.
And why are you focusing on whether the stadium would be built if they didn’t set aside money. Your claim was that there’s no way they would set aside cash in case the referendum didn’t pass. What was the problem you thought would occur in that case. As I mentioned, and you ignored, having extra cash would not have been a problem.
Let’s try it in reverse. The Broncos had to come up with around 100 million to build the stadium, over and above their usual cash flow. Where do you suppose that money came from?
Furthermore, if it’s a proven fact why is it so hard for you to reference the evidence? You obviously think I’m very, very dumb, so help a brother out.
To be clear about what I’m asking, there are two scenarios in contention.
Scenario (1) let’s say for simplicity sake that Davis was paid 5 million for 1997. Davis was counted as 5 million against the cap, but he was actually paid 2.5 million in 1997 and another 2.5 million in a later year. That’s a cap violation.
Scenario (2) Davis was counted as 2.5 million against the cap in 1997 but actually was paid 5 million by a later payment. That also is a cap violation, and substantially more egregious.
Where is the evidence that scenario 2 is actually what happened.
|
TRANSLATED: Hi, my name is manchambo & I can't answer or refute any points made to me, but can only try and dodge them with non-relevant blather -- none of which changes the fact that my Donkeys
SUCK and they have no legit SB victories to their credit.