[tooge]

Originally Posted by BroncoBuff

You guys just don't get it. I'm not sure why, but you don't.

I'll explain s l o w l y . . .

.

1. I posted a statistic analysis that counted just NFL games
2. I also post our teams' H2H should best be seen in NFL games only, leaving out the 19-1 in the intentionally uneven, non-competitive AFL
3. You guys CRY OUT "No BroncoBuff, no!" You can't leave out AFL games, that's the OTHER time we were good!"
4. Oh, but NOW - now you're FINE with excluding other records merely because they're NAMED differently: "No BroncoBuff, no! The first of those three wasn't even called "Super Bowl!'"

I got news for you - The second and third of those three weren't called Super Bowls either, not until two years later. Which proves even further that it's all about names, not about a true 3-Peat record.

It's a double standard on your part, plain and simple. A completely understandable double standard, in that your Chiefs-centric narrow minds badly want to believe you'll be the "First Ever," and the NFL's Promo Machine is working overtime to drive your thinking in that direction, so it's understandable. But it's still a double standard.

Anything before the NFL/AFL merger doesn't count when comparing Superbowls, sorry. This is a fact: The Kansas City Chiefs are the first team ever to play in two Superbowls in a row and play in a third with a chance to 3 peat.