|
The fact that a poster either shares thanksgiving dinner with, or more likely lays down for a player, doesn't exactly give them exlusive rights to judge what they do on the field.
The fact that he might have a swollen knuckle that makes for a fabulous shocker, or a pecker so crooked he could pee around a corner have no bearing on his ability to make a tackle in the open field, or wrap up a ball carrier with explosion and good technique.
I can understand why someone with a personal relationship with a player would be more "sensitive" to criticism, but I can also see how a player might not be too keen on someone in thier lives acting like a vegas Escourt online too.
|