Quote:
Originally Posted by foxman
Thats kind of a BS statement. Almost every replacement coach this season has been a coordinator and we can not know how that's going to pan out. Sure we can all debate that we needed a proven commodity yadda yadda, I challenge that. Why did we need an experianced coach, because we have a veteran team? Thats a weak reason IMO.
|
If we would have hired a guy who has an outstanding record as a coordinator, fine.
Sanders would have fit the bill.
No one else did.
The Pats D coordinator has only 1 year of experience and didn't do all that well.
WTF did the Packers new HC do?
There were a TON of reaches this year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by foxman
Threads like this allow us to bitch and complain. I don't think anyone expects to change anything.....so as you say, GET OVER IT.
|
You'll be surprised how quick 4 years passes.
JR is in a transition period right now and IMHO the only reason Carl was retained was due to his experience and time with the KC organization.
I fully expect JR to be much more hands on as an owner. And no matter the next GM he'll be light years from Peterson. Has to be.
Good or bad...