Quote:
|
It's quite clear, that the research is ambiguous; suggestive that it IS a combination of both biological predisposition AND sociological phenomena--nature and nurture.
|
The only thing that suggests is that the research, which is approached from various different positions with different results in mind, is ambiguous.
As for J. Michael Bailey, anyone with the slightest bit of moral and ethical understanding should be able to recognize and condemn his particular brand of calumniation and deceit. He's a deluded maniac at best, and a conniving snake-oil peddler at worst.