Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jspchief
I don't subscribe to the "BAA" theory, nor do I subscribe to the "position of need" theory. It has to be a combination of the two.
Of course, I may be in the minority on my opinion that WR is not a position of need.
|
I prescribe to BAA, as long as it IS a position of need. We definitely could still use a WR. Kennison has probably TWO YEARS maximum left. Parker looks like a possession receiver, and Hall is too small, IMO to be an everydown wide-out.
I definitely PREFER a defensive stud with our first rounder, but landing the consenus best WR in the draft would be a major coup, too.