Quote:
|
Originally Posted by htismaqe
No, not for me it's not.
The expectations CHANGE depending on whether Green's injury is short-term or long-term.
Those numbers for Manning look OK, until you consider that those 28 INT's contributed mightily to them being 3-13.
The goal is to win games, no matter how ugly it might look.
|
That team sucked top to bottom. How do you think they got Manning to begin with?
Manning's 28 INT's aren't any more to blame for those losses than the overall team around him is to blame for his INTs. They were 3-13 the year before, without his 28 INTs.