Quote:
|
Originally Posted by FAX
That's a pretty interesting thought, actually. Thanks.
I've looked at the stats and, so far at least, am unable to find anything that would reasonably confirm that he did, in fact, redefine the position from a performance standpoint. At first, I thought that he would have had a longer ypc average which would be reflective of greater athleticism, but that's not the case. He's only near the top in that category. Then, I looked at size in the position, but nothing stands out there either.
I hate to admit it, but I think Mr. milkman may turn out to be right about this. Unless, of course, I can construct a compelling argument around your theory.
FAX
|
I think the OC's had something to do with the use or utility function of the TG position.
Plus, DV's total lack of concern for the D, and willingness to innovate on a high powered O that fully utilizes a TE, and a workable athlete such as TG and bam, you have a new kind of TE.