Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mcan
What? Now you're not making any sense. Of course you shouldn't actually DO something to prove that it's bad.
But depicting something is totally different than DOING it.
This all boils down to the fact that you think underage nudity is always always always always exploitation of that youth, despite the "intent." There is no way to argue for or against that. That's a moral belief. One that I happen to disagree with.
|
His whole argument is that there shouldn't be a place in Hollywood where a 12 year old is getting naked to do a scene of sexual nature, no matter what artistic merit or implications it may have.
Its not that the movie won't serve a good purpose, but that the actual act of filming the scene is wrong.
Moooo