View Single Post
Old 12-05-2006, 01:07 PM   #5
Mr. Kotter Mr. Kotter is offline
The Dude Abides
 
Mr. Kotter's Avatar
 

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dakota Country
Casino cash: $3324285
Quote:
Originally Posted by FringeNC
That's a little circular reasoning there. Obviously, if we had a good pass rush we could stop the pass. Problem is, we don't. If we can't get a pass rush going against the weakest o-line in the NFL....
I think Whitlock is right; it's not that we can't bring a pass rush....I just think they chose to be very "vanilla" with their approach on Sunday--not wanting to show too much to the Ravens and/or Chargers.

I think they were arrogant enough to think they didn' "need" to bring a pass rush....

I mean, sure the front four "tried" to get to the Cleveland QBs--as Herm said in the post-game....

But when they can't get to the QB, they need to mix it up with more stunts and blitzes. They sat on those Sunday. SAT on them.

FTR, I'm not saying we are one of the better pass rushing teams in the league, but if we need to.....we CAN get at the QB. On Sunday we chose not to get after the QB. That's just inexcusable in my mind.

If you doubt me, watch them the rest of the season. Seriously.
__________________
"I've always said I worry about legacy and winning rings more than making money at this moment...We see what's going on around the league, but at the same time, I'll never do anything that's going to hurt us from keeping the great players around me.”
Posts: 46,875
Mr. Kotter has disabled reputation
    Reply With Quote