View Single Post
Old 04-04-2007, 06:12 PM   #39
CoMoChief CoMoChief is offline
Mahomes Dynasty
 
CoMoChief's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Parts Unknown
Casino cash: $7672254
Quote:
Originally Posted by AutumnWind
Oakland or KC Chiefs?

DL advantage Oakland Sapp, Burgess, Kelly, Sands are better than DUI BOY, Hali and the rest of scrub DT's.

LB's advantage Oakland. Young LB's in Morrison, Howard, Williams are some of the most underated in the league. KC is pretty good with DJ being the best and NAP hasn't been the same since he left Oak town and Edwards is a stop gap at this point in his career.

Secondary isn't even close as Oaklands young DB's have proved to be bigger playmakers playing in a tough man to man D instead of a crappy talent masking cover 2. Ty Law is one of the most overrated CB's ever and has made his name on 3 good games in his career.

Overall stats

Oakland
3 overall in league

NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G
Oakland 4557 284.8 2144 134.0 2413 150.8 332 20.8

Oaklands Pts allowed is amazing since they fielded the worst offense in the history of NFL last year.

KC
16 overall in league

NAME YDS YPG RUSH RUSH YPG PASS PASS YPG PTS PTS/G
Kansas City 5262 328.9 1928 120.5 3334 208.4 315 19.7

Can't wait to see how the homers here spin their arguments that KC's D is better.
Your LB's are a bunch of faqqots that can't play football.

The ONLY thing you have over us on defense are the DT's and interior rush. Thats it. That alone will make ANY defense look better than what it really is.
__________________
Posts: 39,245
CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.CoMoChief is too fat/Omaha.
    Reply With Quote