Quote:
Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins
Let's go from Super Bowl XXIII-XLI
Teams with better O's than D's
San Fran X 3--Great offenses, solid D's
Dallas X3--Great Offenses, really good D's
Denver X2--Great Offenses, a workmanlike D
New England X2--and two really good offenses
Green Bay--Great offense, good defense
St. Louis--One of the best offenses in NFL history, opportunistic D
Indy--All time great O, poor defense
Washington--A great offense and a pretty damned good d
Teams with better D's than O's
New England, SB XXXVI
Baltimore, SB XXXV
Pittsburgh, SB XL
Giants, SB XXV
I'm not saying you don't need a good d to help you win, but people who think that defense wins championships are just clueless to the reality of the NFL.
|
You'd definitely have to add the Bears to that list. The Dolphins and Steelers were also defensive teams. The Bucs that trashed the Raiders were a defensive team.
I'd say that easily 1/2 the Super Bowl teams were stronger on defense than offense. It's about even.
The big difference is that a great defense can carry a horrible offense but it doesn't work the other way around. Horrible defenses don't win.