Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BucEyedPea
So in other words you're mind is made up on incomplete information?
|
Made up? Not completely, but baring having 100% of the fact I have to form my opinion based on what I have.
Quote:
|
Did it ever occur to you, they needed proof and there was no time inbetween to file a complaint. There's many scenarios that could explain things. This is what incomplete information does to people....they make up data if only to make sense of the situation based on original stories.
|
This is way far fetched. I'm sure that if there was enough reason for the Pats to go Perry Mason on the Jets there should have been enough to call the league office and say "Hey, we're suspicious, you guys ought to look into this". It's not like the NFL has standing penalties for inaccurately accusing teams as long as it's not public.
There's enough evidence, apparently, for the NFL to issue a statement saying that they think the Pats are guilty. They're giving them a chance to explain but whatever they have seems to be proof enough for them.