Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mmaddog
But from the same view, you cannot be sure. No one knows for sure, because the RIAA doesn't want to tip it's hand. But I can say with surety that if the RIAA thought it could successfully argue that it is illegal to do what is inferred at this time, they would do it.
mmaddog
*******
|
Who can be sure? If this was really argued in a court of law, I'm pretty confident a judge would over-rule those claims.
How would a law of this type even be enforced? I don't think it's possible.