View Single Post
Old 01-11-2008, 09:32 PM   #93
ChiefaRoo ChiefaRoo is offline
MVP
 
ChiefaRoo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Austin,TX
Casino cash: $3917505
Quote:
Originally Posted by TN_Chief
It seems like the argument I'm hearing is that the "regulars" are smokers and are the ones being driven out...and that the walk-up business (less reliable/steady) is non-smokers. If that's true, then I'd think the "regulars" would embrace becoming members in order to maintain their ability to smoke.

I think you'd have to try to structure it in a similar manner to the bars (AKA "drinking clubs") in Salt Lake City where you pay a "membership fee" (which is really just a cover) to get in and drink. SLC public establishments aren't allowed to serve alcohol (damn Mormons) and that's how the bars there get around that law...they're not "public", they're private clubs.
Maybe it would work. I don't mind the concept because it would definately be an incentive for the owner to eliminate the smoking all together in the long run. I mean, why put up with the hassle of it all?
Posts: 11,953
ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.ChiefaRoo is too fat/Omaha.
    Reply With Quote