Quote:
Originally Posted by TN_Chief
It seems like the argument I'm hearing is that the "regulars" are smokers and are the ones being driven out...and that the walk-up business (less reliable/steady) is non-smokers. If that's true, then I'd think the "regulars" would embrace becoming members in order to maintain their ability to smoke.
I think you'd have to try to structure it in a similar manner to the bars (AKA "drinking clubs") in Salt Lake City where you pay a "membership fee" (which is really just a cover) to get in and drink. SLC public establishments aren't allowed to serve alcohol (damn Mormons) and that's how the bars there get around that law...they're not "public", they're private clubs.
|
Maybe it would work. I don't mind the concept because it would definately be an incentive for the owner to eliminate the smoking all together in the long run. I mean, why put up with the hassle of it all?