Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HemiEd
Oh no, not at all. I just had two heart surgerys.
The compromise is, exactly like we both mentioned in previous posts. The owner of the establishment should have a right. If it is non-smoking, so be it, smokers should be able find a place they prefer. Likewise for the non-smoker, if it bothers him, go find someplace else.
Whats next Laz, are you willing to let them tell you your old lady can't give you a blow job in your own house? That might offend someone you know, where do you draw the line?
Seem silly to you? Let me tell you, 20 years ago these laws sounded just as far fetched.
|
that's why i said "i agree" when you talked about government keeping their dam noses out of things.
i don't want them in my bedroom and i don't want them telling me how to live.
Government has one job and that is protection imo
the question is, where does the government job start and end "protecting" people from 2nd hand smoke?
maybe ban smoking .... but then let owners apply/sign up to be a smoking establishment? That way people have the ability to assume "clean air" unless the front of the building says "Smoking establishment"
