Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Adept Havelock
So tell me, Dane, are they "Publicly owned areas/properties?" No. They are not. They are owned by PRIVATE companies or individuals. That's what makes them Private areas, open to the public.
As for Zoning laws, WTF does that have to do with anything? I've never seen a zoning law that made private property the property of the government.
If the business owner owns the property, then they should be allowed to decide for themselves. If a landlord owns the property, they should get to decide. Simple.
See my response to this same question in my previous posts.
Public property is owned by the government. Private property is not.
Sorry that's too difficult a concept for a Californian to get.
|
You REALLY just don't understand the concept of business ownership and it's applicable laws, do you?
Thanks for pointing out, AGAIN, that I live in California. It's only listed in my avatar, but thanks for reminding me. The NEXT time that ANYONE says that there isn't a negative bias of Californians, I can point to this thread (as it happens every so often on the 'Planet.).
If I start a business, get a loan, create an LLC and enter a lease agreement with property owner, I am BOUND to all of the laws that exist in that city. It's not a residence. It's a building that has certain laws exclusive to that city. I just can't avoid things like business insurance, sprinkler systems, permitted HVAC system and any other items required by the city.
If the CITY requires that my establishment be non-smoking, it doesn't matter if it's a privately held business or a publicly held business. My business is not a sanctuary, immune to the laws set forth by the state and local government.
Responding to you like responding to a ten year-old who knows absolutely nothing about the law or business ownership. I'm not going to detail every facet of every topic just so that you can refute it with your inane drivel.
Good day to you, Mr. Havelock.