Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58
It's become painfully obvious where the dividing line is in this argument.
There's the group who isn't thinking a day past December 31, 2008.
And then there's the group who is more concerned about 2010, 2011, etc.
|
Not sure what you mean by that.
If you mean those in favor of a stud LT are looking short term, I posit that;
1) LTs have a longer NFL shelf life than most positions,
2) the overwhelming majority of successful teams have a stud LT as an underappreciated cornerstone.
So how in the hell is acquiring a foundational element that's more likely to be around for a long time than other positions shortsighted?