Thread: Fire Muser
View Single Post
Old 04-29-2002, 11:09 AM   #11
Mr. Laz Mr. Laz is offline
Don't Tease Me
 
Mr. Laz's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: KS
Casino cash: $9387
Quote:
Originally posted by Alphaman


I agree in part. But I think revenue sharing has to happen first. In MLB you basically have 3 parties. The big market owners, the small market owners, and the players. Until the owners get on the same page and want all teams to compete equally, then there is no incentive for the players to accept a salary cap.

the salary cap pretty much has to happen at the same time... because why would a big market owner agree to profit sharing when a smaller owner will just use that money to jack up the market price without having any real parity impact.

profit sharing without a salary cap still leave the world series up for the highest bidder.

nope, we need a salary cap of about 65 million and complete media based profit sharing.


then baseball can be successfull in any market that has good fan support.
Posts: 82,337
Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.Mr. Laz is obviously part of the inner Circle.
  Reply With Quote